3月23号,jcp发布了jsR 250: Common Annotations for the javaTM Platform early draft review(http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=250),引发了tss的一场规模不大不小的讨论(http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=32833),其中一条reply让人感觉很有意思:springFramework的Rod Johnson的一条reply说:Hani ??????? Posted by: Rod Johnson on March 24, 2005 in response to Message #163144 1 replies in this thread Talking of membership, my application to join the JSR-250 expert group when it was established (last August or September I think) was rejected.RgdsRod 然后又有个简短的回应:And?这个and,我理解的意思是: 那又如何呢?或者,那又说明什么呢?
如果说JSR 250还主要是针对J2EE的,那么下面的针对J2SE的"is evil"系列的关于annotation新文章竟又牵出了DomainObject/ServiceObject以及贫血模型的议题:http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-09-2003/jw-0905-toolbox.html
不仅仅是用到语言方面,annotation现在还想到Validity Constraints方面试一把:http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=32725下面的评论有一条非常的尖刻:Yet another stupid idea. Now is the time for annotation hype and everybody will try to use it, properly or not.
http://www.gaodaima.com/40724.htmlAnnotations:hype or not?
在公元2005年的今天,annotation的确应该算是一个超级炒冷饭,那么,是不是象评论中说的那样,有人Just invent something, spread the word and hope you will get famous呢?我们拭目以待.
欢迎大家阅读《Annotations:hype or not?》,跪求各位点评,若觉得好的话请收藏本文，by 搞代码
转载请注明原文链接：Annotations:hype or not?
